If you use any sources, cite all your sources, giving author, title, publication, year, and URL.Your paper should address whether Mr Thompson has given informed consent and whether the medical team should go ahead with the procedure. Consider what options they have available to them and which option is best. Explain and justify your view.
Read the following case study.
Your paper should address whether Mr Thompson has given informed consent and whether the medical team should go ahead with the procedure. Consider what options they have available to them and which option is best. Explain and justify your view.
As a second-year neurology resident, Dr. Johnson has been fascinated by the case of Mr. Thompson, a construction worker who was nailing shingles to a roof when his co-workers gun slipped, lodging a nail deep into Mr. Thompsons frontal lobe. Although comatose at first, Mr. Thompson regained consciousness and function under Dr. Johnsons care.
Despite his physical improvements after this accident, everyone in Mr. Thompsons life agreed that he was not himself. Previously a gregarious, sunny man, according to his family and friends, the kind of guy who always had a good word for everyone, a joker, he had now become surly, withdrawn, and disinhibited. Before the accident Mr. Thompson loved having his friends and family around; now he threw everyone out of the room at the slightest provocation, all the while cursing and screaming. Happily married to his wife for 27 years, Mr. Thompson had three children and no prior history of medical or psychiatric disorders. After his accident, however, he disparaged and insulted his wife when she visited and refused to see his children. He had a living will in the chart in which his wife was named as his health care proxy. During his recovery from the accident she had made decisions for him.
When Mr. Thompson had made good progress in his physical recovery, the neurosurgery team brought up the topic of removing the nail lodged in his skull, presenting the risks and benefits of the surgery to Mrs. Thompson. Even though the operation would be tricky, the surgeons firmly believed that the benefits outweighed the risks. Mrs. Thompson opposed the surgery, but Mr. Thompson was adamant about going ahead with it.
Dr. Johnson was called to Mr. Thompsons room. The nursing staff reported that he was particularly agitated after a visit from his wife, during which they had discussed the possibility of surgery. Im tired of my family telling me what to do, those jerks, Mr. Thompson groused. I dont know why I married Laverne in the first place, and I dont even think the kids are mine. I want to change that living will and get her off of there. Nobody makes decisions for me but me.
Dutifully, Dr. Johnson assessed his patients capacity. Mr. Thompson was alert and oriented to person, place, and time; he passed the cognitive exam with flying colors. He verbalized understanding of his situation, stated clearly his treatment options and the risks and benefits of his surgery. He appeared to meet all the clinical benchmarks for decision-making capacity, and he was adamant that he no longer wished for his wife to be his health care proxy.
Dr. Johnson asked his team what they thought. The junior resident said, the guy has a traumatic brain injury. Hes literally not himselfhes a different person. Hes impaired. Thats the bottom line.
I disagree, the senior resident said. Hes clearly oriented and capable of abstract reasoning. Personality changes dont mean you can trample on his autonomy.